Saturday, February 18, 2012

Complementary and Alternative Medications Consumed by Patients With Head and Neck Carcinoma: A Pilot Study in Germany.

Complementary and Alternative Medications Consumed by Patients With Head and Neck Carcinoma: A Pilot Study in Germany.

Feb 2012

Source

a Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery , University Hospital Mannheim , Germany.

Abstract

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) represents a wide range of treatment modalities. CAM products may interact with enzymes, transport proteins, and may therefore influence drug metabolism. The prevalence and patterns of CAM usage among patients with head and neck carcinoma (HNC) are largely unknown. This cross-sectional study was designed to document pattern of CAM consumption in patients with HNC. Statistical differences in a significantly higher prevalence of CAM consumption between tumor patients (n = 107) and the control group (n = 112) could be detected. Concerning the frequency of CAM usage, we could document a significant increased consumption of CAM among tumor patients (42.8% vs. 62.6%) especially for herbal teas (P < 0.05), phytotherapy (P < 0.001), supplement products (P < 0.05), and “other” supplements (P < 0.005) comparing the controls. Furthermore a significant influence of female gender and an increased CAM usage could be illustrated. Concerning the knowledge of potential interactions of CAM consumption, only 6.25% of the controls and 19.6% of tumor patients know about possible side effects but only 1.7% of the controls and 6.5% of the tumor patients informed their physician about the CAM usage. The frequency of CAM in head and neck tumor patients seems to be relevant in the supervision of anticancer therapies.

Taylor Francis Online

Posted by Pat in 15:40:22 | Permalink | No Comments »

Monday, February 13, 2012

Antibacterial activity of thyme and lavender essential oils.

Antibacterial activity of thyme and lavender essential oils.

Source

Microbiology Department, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland. monika.sienkiewicz@umed.lodz.pl.

Abstract

Strong antiseptic activity of essential oils has been known for a long time. The antibacterial activity of oils was tested against clinical bacterial strains of Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, Escherichia and Pseudomonas genera. The agar diffusion method was used for microbial growth inhibition at various concentrations of the oils from T. vulgaris and L. angustifolia. Susceptibility testing to antibiotics and chemotherapeutics was carried out using disc-diffusion method. 120 strains of bacteria isolated from patients with infections of oral cavity, respiratory, genitourinary tracts and from hospital environment were investigated. The results of experiments showed that the oil from T. vulgaris exhibited extremely strong activity against all of the clinical strains. Thyme oil demonstrated a good efficacy against antibiotics resistant strains of the tested bacteria. Lavender oil has been less activity against clinical strains of Staphylococcus, Enterococcus and Escherichia genus. The worst results have been observed against all strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

PubMed

Posted by Pat in 16:56:26 | Permalink | No Comments »

Use of therapies other than disease-modifying agents, including complementary and alternative medicine, by patients with multiple sclerosis: a survey study.

Use of therapies other than disease-modifying agents, including complementary and alternativemedicine, by patients with multiple sclerosis: a survey study.

Jan 2012

Source

Department of Neurology, Drexel University College of Medicine, 219 N Broad St, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107-1506. david.tabby@drexelmed.edu.

Abstract

CONTEXT:

Many patients with multiple sclerosis use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) to supplement their traditional treatment.

OBJECTIVE:

To identify both the prevalence and frequency of use of therapies other than disease-modifying agents (DMAs), including CAM, among patients with multiple sclerosis. Design: The authors administered a 13-question survey regarding patients’ current use of non-DMA therapies-including dietary supplements, exercise, and “true” CAM (eg, acupuncture, chiropractic, massage)-and mainstream treatments, including physical therapy and osteopathic manipulative treatment. Patients rated their level of disability on a scale of 1 to 10 (with 10 being most severe).

SETTING:

A hospital outpatient clinic in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

PATIENTS:

Inclusion criteria were physician-confirmed multiple sclerosis (either relapsing-remitting or progressive), regardless of sex, duration of disease, age at onset, disability level, or type of disease. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years. Main Outcome Measure: Patient-reported use of non-DMA therapies and perception of disability.

RESULTS:

A total of 111 patients with multiple sclerosis completed the survey properly. All respondents used non-DMA therapies. Twenty-three patients (20.7%) used these therapies without concomitantly taking a DMA. A plurality (34.8%) of those patients reported a disability score of 7 or 8. Sixty-two of the 88 participants (70.5 %) who used DMAs reported disability scores of 5 or less. Sixty-five patients (58.6.%) reported exercising on a weekly basis. Among those patients, 47 (72.3%) reported a disability score of 5 or less. Sixty-four patients (57.7%) used such CAM therapies as acupuncture and massage, or such other non-DMA treatments as osteopathic manipulative treatment and psychotherapy. Among those patients, 37 (64.9%) reported a disability score of 5 or less.

CONCLUSION:

Many patients with multiple sclerosis are seeking more than traditional medical treatment. Physicians and other health care professionals must be aware of the extensive use of alternative modalities among these patients, and these professionals must provide guidance and monitoring in use of these therapies to improve outcomes.

Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

Posted by Pat in 15:56:00 | Permalink | No Comments »

Blurred boundaries: the therapeutics and politics of medical marijuana

Blurred boundaries: the therapeutics and politics of medical marijuana

Feb 2012

Source

Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Abstract

For 5 millennia, Cannabis sativa has been used throughout the world medically, recreationally, and spiritually. From the mid-19th century to the 1930s, American physicians prescribed it for a plethora of indications, until the federal government started imposing restrictions on its use, culminating in 1970 with the US Congress classifying it as a Schedule I substance, illegal, and without medical value. Simultaneous with this prohibition, marijuana became the United States’ most widely used illicit recreational drug, a substance generally regarded as pleasurable and relaxing without the addictive dangers of opioids or stimulants. Meanwhile, cannabis never lost its cachet in alternative medicine circles, going mainstream in 1995 when California became the first of 16 states to date to legalize its medical use, despite the federal ban. Little about cannabis is straightforward. Its main active ingredient, δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, was not isolated until 1964, and not until the 1990s were the far-reaching modulatory activities of the endocannabinoid system in the human body appreciated. This system’s elucidation raises the possibility of many promising pharmaceutical applications, even as draconian federal restrictions that hamstring research show no signs of softening. Recreational use continues unabated, despite growing evidence of marijuana’s addictive potential, particularly in the young, and its propensity for inducing and exacerbating psychotic illness in the susceptible. Public approval drives medical marijuana legalization efforts without the scientific data normally required to justify a new medication’s introduction. This article explores each of these controversies, with the intent of educating physicians to decide for themselves whether marijuana is panacea, scourge, or both. PubMed searches were conducted using the following keywords: medical marijuana, medical cannabis, endocannabinoid system, CB1 receptors, CB2 receptors, THC, cannabidiol, nabilone, dronabinol, nabiximols, rimonabant, marijuana legislation, marijuana abuse, marijuana dependence, and marijuana and schizophrenia. Bibliographies were hand searched for additional references relevant to clarifying the relationships between medical and recreational marijuana use and abuse.

Elsevier 

Posted by Pat in 15:51:50 | Permalink | No Comments »

Reimbursement for alternative medical treatment in the Netherlands, incomprehensible

Reimbursement for alternative medical treatment in the Netherlands, incomprehensible

2012

[Article in Dutch]

Source

Universitair Medisch Centrum St Radboud, afd. Interne Geneeskunde, Nijmegen.

Abstract

It is remarkable that, at a time when not only doctors but also the Health Care Inspectorate (IGZ) and the health insurance companies are paying increasing attention to the quality of conventional medicine, many alternative methods of treatmentswithout a scientific basis are accepted in the Netherlands. Even though it has been conclusively demonstrated that mostalternative therapies do not work and despite the absence of scientific proof of the safety and efficacy of alternativetreatments, health insurance companies do often reimburse the incurred costs. Because the safety of alternative therapies is not guaranteed, these are neither in the interest of the patient nor of society. Moreover, they are associated with considerable costs for the individual patient. By reimbursing the costs of insufficiently proven treatments, the health insurance companies are applying double standards. Reimbursement for these therapies is made at the expense of other effective and proven treatments. This can be changed through the concerted efforts of policy-makers, doctors, the IGZ, and health insurance companies.

PubMed

Posted by Pat in 15:47:38 | Permalink | No Comments »

Thursday, February 9, 2012

FDA Ratings for Alternative or Complimentary Medicines

What the FDA ratings mean.

Related Terms: lymphedema, immunocompromised, fda, fda drug ratings, medical equipment, infections, bacterial, fungal, clnical trials, evidence based, effectivenss ratings

Those of us with lymphedema are immunocompromised in the lymphademetous limbs, making us a highly at risk group for serious infections, both bacterial and fungal. As such, many many of us have been on extensive antibiotic therapy and often use medical supplements in our attempts to stay healthier and/or to fight infections. I thought, therefore, it might be important for us to understand what certain drug, or products ratings mean

We have all seen these ratings on various medicines, drugs, compounds and what not. But, what exactly do they mean?

My favorite is “FDA approved.” This could be many many things and drug manufacturers, medical equipment manufactures all throw this around to impress we the patients to trust them and buy their product.

Effectiveness of the ratings. The Effectiveness ratings in the Database are EVIDENCE-BASED. The FDA doesn’t regulate herbs and dietary supplements like prescription drugs. Herbs and dietary supplements can be sold without ANY proof of effectiveness or safety. Our team evaluates all of the medical literature to give you Effectiveness ratings based on the best scientific evidence. We rate each product for a particular use or condition. If a product is used to treat more than one condition, you may find different effectiveness ratings for each use.

Here are the ratings you will see…

Effective: This product has passed a rigorous scientific review (similar to and as rigorous as the review of drugs done by the FDA)… and found to be effective for a specific use.

Likely Effective: Reputable scientific references generally agree that the product is effective for a specific use … and at least two scientifically rigorous studies (involving at least several hundred patients) found the product to be likely effective… and the studies are published in reputable scientific journals.

Possibly Effective: Reputable scientific references suggest that the product might work for a specific use … and at least one study (in humans) found that the product might be effective.

Possibly Ineffective: Reputable scientific references suggest that the product might not work for a specific use… and at least one study (in humans) found that the product might not be effective.

Likely Ineffective: Reputable scientific references generally agree that the product is not effective for a specific use… and at least two scientifically rigorous studies found the product likely to be ineffective… and the studies are published in reputable scientific journals.

Ineffective: Most reputable scientific references agree that the product is not effective for a specific use… and no reliable human studies show the product to be effective.

Insufficient Evidence: If we know claims are being made about a product but there is no scientific info available about the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the product, we’ll let you know.


Posted by Pat in 16:23:04 | Permalink | No Comments »

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Blog Comments

All comments are moderated.

You are wasting your time if you post one.

With Blog.com you can not prevent people posting, but you can moderate them.

I do not want your comments and they WILL be deleted.

Posting nice little comments so that you can put a link to your blog on this site is not welcome, wanted or desired.  Frankly, it’s pretty stupid too as you are wasting your time (and mine).

Pat

Posted by Pat in 14:06:51 | Permalink | No Comments »

Monday, May 25, 2009

Light Beam Generator Therapy for Lymphedema

Light Beam Generator Therapy

My Opinion

As an individual who has had to cope with lymphedema for over fifty years, I wanted to establish a website that would bring any and all possible information on lymphedema, the lymphatics, research, treatments etc. into one place on the internet.

As such, I have presented information on a broad range of treatment options, even though I personally may disagree with them and the scientific, .medical validity of the treatments. This subject however, stretches my patience and tolerance.

Supposedly these devices flood the body with ions, making claim to break up lymph blockages, reverse fibrosis of the tissues, cleanse the body and restore vibrant health.

The problem is the I can find absolutely not one independent medical or scientific shred of evidence to back up these claims. There are no double blind clinical studies (that I can find), no autonomous studies that verify its effectiveness.

What we do have is a very expensive treatment modality that someone created, put out self-proclaimed stories of effectiveness and success – and even started a foundation that you can give money too (if you have any left after treatment) to further their “new-age” medical studies.

Those of us who must endure and cope with lymphedema crave successful treatment, even long for a cure. But we can not accept someone’s claims just on their face value. We must demand evidence – apart from their claims. We must demand independent studies, clinical evaluations that come from legitimate sources, who especially do not profit from the products or treatment devices.

All I simply request is that a credible source, apart from the inventor and seller verify its claims. Also, we expect independent verification of its safety, long term affects and reports on any placebo effect.

Update April 19, 2008

As of this date, there are still no independent clinical studies backing up the claims of the therapy technique.  The only thing that really has happened is that after an article in Quack Watch, the manufacturer changed the wording to make it more nebulous and generic.

The therapy is now actually called “Photon Tissue Decongestion Therapy.”

OK, beam me up Scotty.

My opinion on this remains unchanged and I can only hope that no lymphedema patients allow themselves to undertake this.

It is so vitally  important  that we once and for all need to recognize that there is no magic bullet, no magic pill, no magic cure for lymphedema.  Indeed, if there were, we would all be lined up to buy it.  There simply is no replacement at the present time for a treatment protocol of manual decongestive therapy, compression bandages, compression garments and a compliant patient who is willing to take the time necessary for proper management…a patient who does so because they as a person are worth it.

Pat O’Connor

Lymphedema People

=========================================

Disclaimer: The information that follows is presented for information only. Inclusion of this information in this website does not constitute acceptance or approval. I urge the reader to consult with and involve their physician and lymphedema therapists in any medical treatment for lymphedema.

=========================================

What is the LBG® (Light Beam Generator)

The LBG is a valuable tool for assisting in restoring proper functioning of the body’s immune defense system through re-establishing the lymphatic system. It does this by helping to disassociate disorganized protein structures which may also be toxic material blocking the lymphatic system and placing the inter-cellular fluid in a free-flow state for easier removal by the lymphatic system. To many patients surprise, the LBG has enhanced manual massage efforts by over 90% and helps provide the patient with immediate relief from swollen conditions related to blocked lymphatics.

Uses

The LBG® is used by practitioners to facilitate lymph drainage. It is also used in symptom reduction and as an enhancement to preventative efforts to avoid diseases and physical conditions such as cancer, arthritis, headaches, fibromyalgia, and pain.

How does it work?

The LBG®presents a flood of photons that target unhealthy, random protein structures, helping the protein structures to release the water they were holding. Cells in the lymphatic system can clump together and bond electrically with water to create disease conditions of swelling and abnormal growth. The LBG® is able to separate these cells from each other and their accumulated fluids. The result is that swelling, cell or tumor masses and other blockages are easily dispersed.

Light Beam Generator

http://www.teslartech.com/lbg.htm

===================================

Light Beam Generator & ST-8

Lymph System Mobilizer

What it is:

The Light Beam Generator is a 4, 8 or 12 head unit that assists the body in restoring proper lymph function. The Light Beam ST-8 offers an additional boost by pumping oxygen through the heads as well.

The LBG is used to facilitate lymph drainage, and after its use clients have shown noteable improvement in conditions such as lymphedema. It is also used in symptom reduction and as an enhancement to preventative efforts to avoid diseases and physical conditions such as cancer, arthritis, headaches, fibromyalgia, and pain.

How it works:

The lymphatic system is a network of vessels and lymph nodes that runs throughout the body, transporting fluids, nutrients and oxygen and eliminating waste and toxins. It is the body’s primary cleansing and filtration system. The Light Beam Generator uses six different light, gas and electromagnetic pulsing therapies to deliver gentle infrared blue photonic light deep into the lymph nodes and cells, breaking up clumped protein structures that block the lymph system from doing its very important job.

Recommended Treatment Protocol:

Number of treatments depends upon your condition and severity. One treatment per week is recommended to allow the body time to process what gets mobilized.

Location used:
Treatment rooms.

How much it costs:

4-head LBG: $100 per treatment
8-head LBG: $150 per treatment
12-head LBG: $200 per treatment
Light Beam ST-8: $150 per treatment
10% prepaid series discount is available.

How long it takes:

Between one hour and one hour and a half.

Indications for Use:

Signs of lymph congestion, including: achiness, headaches, sluggishness, lethargy, inflammation, digestive discomfort.
Lymphedema, swollen lymph nodes, cellulite, cancer, arthritis,
lupus and many more.
Detoxification.

Contraindications i.e. Do Not Use:

You are pregnant or lactating or
You have a pacemaker, transplanted organ, arrhythmia, or epilepsy or
You are taking blood-thinning medication.

Frequently Asked Questions:

How often can I use the Light Beam Generator?
The Light Beam Generator can be used once per week to start, depending on symptoms. Since the LBG breaks down congestion and mobilizes the toxins, it is important to give the body the time it needs to eliminate the waste. Ask us what is best for your situation.

Set Up and Usage:

Generally best used lying down in a comfortable position.

The main points for lymphatic flow in the upper body are at the clavical region and the sternum. In the lower body, the points are the crease in the leg, near the groin. These areas are targeted to break up blockages and improve lymph drainage. Then other areas can be targeted for special effects.

General Use Protocol:

Position 1: Place one LBG light-emitting head at top of each shoulder and one at each clavicle, (one on each side of body) for 10 to 15 minutes.

Position 2: Move heads from tops of shoulders to: one at the sternum (between the breasts) and one at the solar plexus for 10 to 15 minutes. (The other 2 heads remain at the clavicles.)

Position 3: Move heads from the clavicles to one at top of each hip bone for 10 to 15 minutes. (The other 2 heads remain at sternum and solar plexus.)

Position 4: Move heads from sternum and solar plexus to inguinal nodes, one at the crease in each leg, near the groin area for 10 to 15 minutes. (The other 2 heads remain at hip bones.)
Position 5: Move heads from hip bones to area of interest/edema/lymph stasis for 10 to 15 minutes. For breast issues, focus most on armpit and sides of breasts. For edema, focus on inner arms, both upper and lower or inner legs, under knees.
Completion: Bring heads back up the body, in reverse order, for 5 minutes at each position.

Core Care Center

http://www.corecarecenter.com/lbg.shtml

====================================

How The Light Beam Generator Works

The Light Beam Generator uses extremely low-current, cold gas light photons to transfer energy frequency patterns to cells in the targeted lymphatic regions. Frequency modulation is accomplished with light. The LBG is a much softer technique than using a laser, another light-based technology, and can be safely used by lay practitioners. The device is about the size of a small suitcase, with two hand-held heads attached on cords.

The Light Beam Generator achieves its results on an energetic level. Cells have an electromagnetic charge that either binds them together or keeps them apart. The LBG works by rebalancing the charge of the cells’ electromagnetic field. Cells in the lymphatic system can clump together and bond electrically with water to create disease conditions of swelling or abnormal growths. The LBG is able to separate these cells from each other and their accumulated fluids. The result is that swelling, tumor masses, and other blockages are easily dispersed. The results can be amazingly rapid and complete.

The Problem of Edema

Understanding protein break-down will shed some light on this process. According to Dr. Laibow, “in healthy, living tissues, protein structures are in a state of alignment, but when cells die or become damaged, these protein structures break down.” The lymphatic system is constantly removing wastes, many of which are these damaged proteins. When there is lymphatic congestion and the proteins are not fully removed, pathologies occur. “These nonfunctional proteins have the same electrical properties of attraction, but their structures are random and characterized by instability. This instability causes protein wastes to attract and retain water by electrical bonding.”

This build-up is called edema. The most specific and best use of the LBG is for reducing or eliminating edema, including lymphedema after breast surgery. Using the LBG puts the correct charge back into the cells and breaks up the congestion caused by clusters of water and pooled protein wastes. The LBG is also able to kill the virus, fungus and bacteria that feed on the pooled wastes, making the technique particularly effective for such conditions as sinus congestion, intestinal candida, or respiratory illness including pneumonia. The LBG aids in the removal of unnatural additives in our food including the steroids that mimic hormones and attach to the proteins. With proper lymphatic drainage, they can be flushed out. (Drinking a lot of fluids in concert with LBG treatment assists the body in the detoxification process.)The Light Beam Generator works by presenting a flood of photons that target the unhealthy, random protein structures, causing them to release the water they were holding.

“Since healthy tissue protein structures do not attract water, they are not affected by the energy presented by the LBG,” Dr. Laibow assures us.

“With application of minimal massage drainage techniques, rapid movement of waste material within the cells can occur, since the delivery of waste material to the organs and nodes responsible for body waste disposal is greatly enhanced.” This cold gas ionization technology has been found to reduce manual massage efforts by over 90%, with more immediate relief from conditions related to blocked lymphatics. It can also be used without massage with excellent results.

Target Treatments

Although ELF International makes no claims about the usefulness of the Light Beam Generator for treating specific diseases, physicians who use the device in their practice have found significant improvement in a wide range of conditions. Among these are pain (especially pain involving soft tissue and tissue congestion due to injuries), sciatica, PMS and inflammation related to menstruation, inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, acne and other skin problems, allergies, arthritis, bursitis, diabetes, edema, lupus, fibromyalgia, respiratory conditions, scarring, cellulite, burns, eczema, and fibrocystic disease. The LBG has also been used in the prevention efforts and treatment of breast and prostate cancers, prostate enlargement, mastodynia (breast tension following ovulation), and headache, and as an aid in both pre- and post-op surgical procedures. In all cases, improvement is due to the LBG’s ability to improve lymph flow, while enhancing delivery of oxygen and vital nutrients throughout the bloodstream.

The main points for lymphatic flow in the upper body are at the clavical region and sternum. In the lower body, the points are at the crease in the leg, near the groin (see illustration). These areas are targeted to break up blockages and improve lymph drainage. Then other areas can be targeted for specific effects. Just 5 or 10 minutes on an engorged area can ease the swelling dramatically. For instance, puffiness in the face can be reduced with the LBG so effectively that it can appear that the person had a face lift.

More dramatic results are seen when the LBG is used for treating more serious conditions. In women, treatment of upper body points can remove breast lumps with just two 20-minute treatments, according to Harezi. In men, lower body points are effective for prostate treatment. Dr. Laibow has documented cases of autoimmune disorder, lymphedema secondary to breast cancer surgery, and “a host of other diseases and conditions in which tissue engorgement, compromised lymphatic drainage or other types of fluid imbalance plays a part.”

The Importance of Lymphatic Transport

Cory Carter, N.D., C.N.M.T., M.T., director of Alt Med Ltd., a holistic health clinic in Rapid City, South Dakota, uses the Light Beam Generator as an integral part of his approach to lymphatic therapy.

“Most health practitioners focus on feeding the body or enhancing its ability to eliminate,” Dr. Carter states, explaining the importance of the lymphatic system. “But the idea of transport, the process in between digestion and elimination, is many times forgotten. If nutrients can’t get past the digestive tract and be transported to the area of need, you can supplement until the bank runs dry and all you will have is the classic ‘high-priced stool.’”I tried to use various manual lymphatic techniques to clear the blockages, but achieved only limited success. Although the surface lymphatics responded reasonably well, the deeper channels invariably did not, or else they were made worse by the additional backed up lymph forced into the area. Once I began using the Light Beam Generator, however, I was able to affect the deep lymphatic channels and break up the blockages to restore normal lymphatic flow.” Other practioners agree.

Case Histories

Among Dr. Rima Laibow’s success stories is a 62-year old woman with an auto-immune destruction of her muscle tissue. Steroids had not worked and further contributed to osteoporosis with high pain levels. LBG treatment was focused on her right shoulder. After twenty minutes, her range of motion without pain had increased and her “dowager’s hump” (a fat accumulation caused by the steroids) had resolved on the treated side. Dr. Laibow’s successes led her to state that the LBG marks a significant leap in the development of non-invasive, non-toxic tools “to allow the body to regain the ability to regulate itself.”

Lymph Node Blockages

Certified Clinical Nutritionist and Dark Field Blood Analyst Irene Oswald uses spot specific therapy with the LBG in combination with homeopathy for patients with an internal solid mass. One patient was able to eat solid foods for the first time in several years after six twenty-minute sessions on the intestinal and inguinal area near the groin. With another client, a 66 year old woman with severe lymphedema in her right hand and arm, a one-hour session greatly reduced the swelling and after two additional treatments, her hand returned to and retained its normal size.

Among the more dramatic changes Dr. Carter and his staff have documented using the LBG is in lymph node blockages, especially within breast tissue. “The terror experienced by women who find a lump in their breast is real and profound,” Dr. Carter notes. “Even the potential of finding a lump in the breast area is enough to cause some women to simply refuse to do self-exams at all.

“When a lymph node is hard or ‘sore,’ it is engaged in the warfare of trying to remove toxins or debris from the lymphatic channel so that it can return to its regular job of transporting oxygen, nutrition, or waste to their proper sites. But it can only do its job when it isn’t blocked. The Light Beam Generator is able to safely remove blockages so that the nodes are no longer painful. It is important to remember that we are dealing with noncancerous issues here. Cancer should only be treated by a qualified physician. But how much healthier will your immune system be when it is able to function as normally as possible?”

LBG Enhances Other Protocols

In Dr. Carter’s experience, one session with the Light Beam Generator is the equal of four to eight strictly manual lymphatic massage sessions alone. “It seems that with the Light Beam Generator we can get the lymph to be drawn into the large intestine and eliminated very quickly. It is not uncommon to see, over an eight to twelve hour period, a light colored coating on fecal matter as it is eliminated. This appears to be excess lymph being sloughed off by the body as a result of LBG treatment.”

Like Dr. Carter, other health practitioners who incorporate the Light Beam Generator in their practice find that, once the flow of lymph and the elimination of wastes have been restored to normal, it is essential to then address important day-to-day factors such as diet, nutrition, body structure, and mental health in order to achieve optimum long-term results. By focusing on such factors after LBG treatment, an individualized program can be developed to prevent a recurrence of the problem and to resolve any remaining health problems.

END________

Alt Med.Com – article at:

http://www.lymphinfo.com/articles.htm

……….

Some Notes on the American Academy of  Quantum Medicine (AAQM)] (Mfg of the Light Beam Generator

Stephen Barrett, M.D.

http://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/Nonrecorg/aaqm.html

Posted by Pat in 15:20:08 | Permalink | Comments Off

Magnetic Therapy for the Treatment of Lymphedema

Magnetic Therapy for the Treatment of Lymphedema

Magnetic Therapy

A new and ever increasingly popular method of treating a myriad of diseases is magnetic therapy. I have included a section on it because of reader interest, questions and a simple desire to bring as much information as I can to those with lymphedema.

I must admit however, I was a skeptic before research and I am still unconvinced that the use of magnetic fields, magnetic polarities etc has any real medical value. In presenting the articles that follow, the reader is free to form their own conclusions.

What bothers me the most is the lack of solid double blind clinical studies that will substantiate evidence that this type of therapy actually works. The one done at Baylor University is itself, clouded in controversy. I have found not concrete evidence that it improves lymphaticflow, resolves lymphatic blockages, reverses fibrosisof subcutaneous tissuesor prevents any of the other complications associated with lymphedema.

Not long ago, a member of an online support group proudly announce she was going to buy a magnetic bracelet because she had heard it would help lymphedema.  Her reasons were three fold.  First, she felt, as a patient she was “taking control” of her medical condition, Secondly, she was giving a black-eye to the terrible world of evidence based medicine by seeking a treatment outside their dark domain and finally, she felt this would be a repudiation to those monster “big-money” pharmaceutical companies.

How sad, I thought that this person, any person would place their health in danger to pursue such a dangerous course.  It is estimated by now that magnetic sales are reaching a half billion dollar mark in the US alone.  To me that equals big money, especially since it comes at the expense of the health of so many desperate people seeking effective treatment for their medical condition.  Also, every bit of information we have learned about thelymph system, lymphedema and such comes directly from this “terrible”  world of evidence based medicine and its research.

Ever more important is that we once and for all need to recognize that there is no magic bullet, no magic pill, no magic cure for lymphedema.  Indeed, if there were, we would all be lined up to buy it.  There simply is no replacement at the present time for a treatment protocol of manual decongestive therapy, compression bandages, compression garmentsand a compliant patient who is willing to take the time necessary for proper management…a patient who does so because they as a person are worth it.

However, please do not abandon your physician or your lymphedema therapist to undergo this therapy. This is not meant to take their place.

Pat O’Connor

========================

Disclaimer: This is presented for information only. Inclusion does not constitute an endorsement of the therapies and/or treatment. Individuals should consult with their physicians as to its applicability in their personal situation.

========================

What is Magnetic Therapy ?

During the past few years, magnetic devices have been claimed to relieve pain and to have therapeutic value against a large number of diseases and conditions but what is the scientific evidence ?

Pulsed electromagnetic fields — which induce measurable electric fields — have been demonstrated effective for treating slow-healing fractures and have shown promise for a number of other conditions. However, few studies have been published on the effect on pain of small, static magnets marketed to consumers

Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy has also been evaluated in the treatment of soft tissue injuries, with the results of some studies providing evidence that this form of therapy may be of value in promoting healing of chronic wounds (such as bedsores), in neuronal regeneration, and in many other soft tissue injuries.

Different Types of Magnets

Both ferrite and rare-earth magnets, unlike earlier magnetic materials such as steel, have great resistance to demagnetization, allowing thin disks to be magnetized. This feature allows modern magnets to be mounted in a variety of thin products that can be applied to the body with the magnetic field emanating from the surface.

http://www.magnetic-therapy.net/

========================

Magnetic Therapy

By Ray Cralle, RPT

A new tool is available to patients and rehabilitation specialists in the United States, thanks to the growing demands of alternative medicine.

Most everyone today is aware of some of the changes in medicine, especially as it relates to finding cost-effective means of providing care and treating ailments. Clinicians in this country found “magnetic therapy” a reimbursable medical expense in Germany, Israel, Japan and forty-five other countries and became intrigued with its possibilities for American health care.

Early manufacturers produced the familiar magnet with north and south poles, but growing numbers of investigators have realized the importance of using only one pole (usually north or negative). This allows for a much stronger magnetic field to be placed against the area of pain, which research seems to indicate the need for, especially in chronic pain or overuse symptoms.

The Office of Alternative Medicine of the National Institute of Health in Washington, D.C., has just awarded over a million dollar grant to Ann Gill Taylor, RN, Ph.D. at the University of Virginia, to study the effects of magnets in chronic pain. Dr. Gill Joins a list of doctors and scientists currently interested in this European phenomenon. Prestigious centers such as John Hopkins, Baylor College of Medicine and Massachusetts Institute of Technology are studying magnetic therapy.

I first heard of magnets when a longtime friend and hospital director asked me to go to Dublin, Ireland in 1993 to meet Austin Darragh. MD, a world renowned researcher, who had been using magnets to treat pain. The joy of finding something so simple, yet so effective in helping people relieve pain still fascinates me.

I have practiced for over twenty-four years and have never been as impressed by a technology so simple and effective in helping arthritis, back pain and even fibromyalgia(chronic fatigue). Just to name a few, as safely and cost-effectively as unipole (negative) magnets.

I am convinced that it will soon be commonplace to treat headaches, sports injuries and even allergies with magnets, and that managed care will find it on the top of its list of worthwhile expenses.

Ray Cralle, RPT is a registered physical therapist at Cralle Physical Therapy Services.

Source: The Senior News, April, 1997

http://www.therionresearch.com/learning_center_articles.html

========================

What is magnetic therapy?

Magnetic therapy is a safe, non-invasive method of applying magnetic fields to the body for therapeutic purposes. It helps to speed the healing process and improve quality of sleep without any adverse side effects. Whether used independently or as an adjunct to your current treatment, magnetic therapy is very effective for the relief of discomfort due to joint and muscle pain, inflammation, and stiffness, making it an excellent choice for everyone.

Over the centuries, it has been well documented that many cultures, including the ancient Chinese, Greeks and Egyptians, have applied magnets to relieve pain and other symptoms. However, the size and weight of the magnets existing during that time, made them difficult to use. Today, smaller and stronger magnetic materials have led to the application of modern day magnetic therapy products used by over 120 million people worldwide.

Clinical studies in the United States have shown magnetic therapy to be an effective method for relieving pain and discomfort. Japan and many eastern European countries have conducted studies for over 30 years, and researchers continue to find that it provides tremendous benefits for a wide range of conditions. Physicians in the United States using magnetic therapy in their practices have reported many case histories showing positive benefits for their patients as well.

How does magnetic therapy work?

All physical and mental functions are controlled by electromagnetic fields produced by the movement of electro-chemicals (ions) within the body. When an injury occurs and tissueis damaged, positively charged ions move to the affected area, causing painand swelling. In order for healing to take place, the injured site must be restored to its natural negative electromagnetic charge. Pain and inflammatory-related electro-chemicals must be removed and oxygen and nutrientstransferred to the area.

The application of a magnetic field to an injured area helps restore the normal electromagnetic balance. The magnetic field relaxes capillarywalls, as well as surrounding muscle and connective tissues, allowing for increased bloodflow. More oxygen and nutrients are transferred to the injury site, while pain and inflammatory-related electro-chemicals are more efficiently removed. The overall process restores the normal electromagnetic balance of the area, relieving pain and inflammation, and promoting accelerated healing.

Individual response time will vary, and can range from a few minutes, to a few weeks. The effectiveness of magnetic therapy is dependent upon using the correct magnetic products, the length of time they are applied, and the type and severity of the problem.

Is magnetic therapy safe?

Yes, magnetic therapy is safe. No complications have ever been reported with its proper use. Magnetic therapy products use magnets that when applied to the body, have positive therapeutic benefits.

There are certain conditions where magnet therapy should not be used. Magnetic therapy should not be used if you are wearing a pacemaker, defibrillator, insulin pump or any other implanted electro-medical device, and should not be used if you are pregnant.

Do magnetic therapy products generate the same magnetic fields as power lines and other electrical devices?

The electromagnetic fields surrounding power lines and electrical appliances are a very different type of magnetic field, and have no relation to the natural, healing fields produced by Therion’s magnetic products.

How effective can magnetic therapy be?

According to most experts in the field, if magnetic therapy products are designed and used properly they can be 80%-90% effective. The problem is that Biomagnetics is a far more complex science than most people realize, so knowing how to accomplish this is no easy task and requires highly specialized engineering and manufacturing capabilities.

What determines the effectiveness of a magnetic therapy product?

To be effective, a magnetic therapy product must produce a magnetic field of sufficient strength and size at the site of the injury or affected area. The problem is that the strength of a magnetic field drops off rapidly as the distance from the magnet increases, and an injured area can be several inches below the surface of the skin. If the product is not properly designed, the field could easily drop below therapeutic levels before it even reaches the injury site, and the product would then be ineffective.

Companies that provide insufficient product information, and incorrectly use the gauss rating of magnets to indicate the strength of their products compound the problem. The manufacturer’s gauss rating of a magnet indicates the amount of magnetic energy (residual induction) that the magnetic material can hold, but alone is not an indication of the strength of the magnet.

Since the gauss rating is identical for all magnets made of the same material, regardless of the size or number of magnets, products using smaller and fewer numbers of magnets are made to appear more effective than they really are.

To be therapeutically effective, a magnetic field must penetrate the injured area at a high enough gauss strength. There is no way to tell if the magnetic field is strong enough just by knowing the gauss rating of the magnets.

The mass (surface area and thickness) of the magnets, the number of magnets, the polarity facing the body and the gauss rating of the magnets used, all determine the strength and penetration depth of the magnetic field produced by a magnetic therapy product.

http://www.healiohealth.com/tek9.asp?pg=products&grp=82

========================

Magnetic Therapy – General health Information

This page contain an extensive number of links to other articles

http://www.allhealthlinks.com/dir/1041/1/781.php

========================

Doctors, Psychiatrists Turning to Magnets

Drug Addiction and the Brain

Magnetic Field Therapy: Professional and Personal Observations

By Dr. Edward Friedler, MD

I use magnetic products and I recommend magnetic products to my patients. I sponsored an introductory lecture on Magnetic Field Therapy to other family physicians. Is this professional heresy, or open mindedness with the interest of my patients coming first.

My formal training in Family Practice required exposure to all the traditional medical and surgical specialties. A family physician must have a wide array of management options for his or her patients. In spite of years of training and clinical experience, it is unfortunately not unusual for my “bay of tricks ” to be unsatisfactory or empty! Because it is anathema for me to tell patients “There is nothing more I can do for you,” I have referred some to chiropractors and not discouraged others seeking help through other “alternative” providers. And now, I am one too!

I use magnetic products for a variety of ailments. Because I see people in the setting of a medical office, there is an expectation that any treatment is recommended after a working diagnosis is made. In other words, I listen to and examine my patients and get appropriate lab information and x-raysfirst. Once the data is collected and considered and a working diagnosis made, I then organized a discussion on treatment options. For the person complaining of fatigue, I treat anemiawith iron andvitamins, not a magnet. For a person with achy legs and low potassium, I treat with potassium, not a magnet. Yet there are times when iron, potassium, aspirin, or a narcotic pain pill are not the appropriate remedies, or are not enough. In these cases, I encourage my patients to try a magnet. Let me share some success stories.

Cancer: Dr. F was diagnosed with cancerat age 41. After three months of chemotherapy, he decided that because the track record for chemotherapy was poor, it would be crazy to not add other modalities to his own treatment. Since his oncologist was concerned with chemotherapydosing, and didn’t know about other treatments, Dr. F on his own added Magnetic Field Therapy, via a mattress pad, chair pads in the office and home, and a large magnet worn against the lower spine. (Dr. F added other “modalities” over the next few months.) He experienced fewer negative side effects of chemotherapy, to the surprise of his oncologist. He lived, and still lives to tell about it, I am happy to say, because Dr. F is me!

Arthritis: I remember Mrs. R whose knee joint had no cartilage. No medicine prescribed by me or other doctors had helped her. I taped a small magnet to her knee after a physical exam, and left the room while she got dressed. When I came back to minutes later, she was bending her knee in disbelief; it didn’t hurt. The arthritis wasn’t gone, but the severe pain was.

Fractured rib: Mr. E had fallen and broken a rib; his oncologist had given him Percocet for pain. He came in to see me, saying the rib still hurt and the drug made him feel bad. I advised him to place a magnet where the pain was causing him discomfort. He later told me the diminishment pain was “instantaneous.” The rib still broken, but he was able to discontinue the Percocet. When he broke another rib two months later, he used a magnet first.

Brown recluse spider bite: Mr. W was bitten by a brown recluse spider. He had a one inch ulcer on his lower leg that was not healing. It hurt, too. We taped a magnet over the ulcer. The pain was less and it began to heal up quickly. The magnet, while he used it decreased the pain.

Swollen eye: A boy had been hit in the face by a baseball. His eyelids were swollen. He had already used ice. I gave him a mini magnet and told him to use it where the sting occurred. The swelling was gone the next day. I was surprised.

Shoulder pain: Dr. Q was experiencing a nagging pain in her shoulder for more than three months. She attended the lecture on Magnetic Field Therapy. During this event she held a magnet to her shoulder. The next morning, her shoulder was normal and the pain was gone. My own theory is she used the magnet on her own. (At that same meeting, another doctor used a magnet on a painful knee, which had been through many drugs and physical therapy. The next day, she came to my office for a second magnet, because it was helping her so much.)

Tiredness: When all the tests are normal, doctors often diagnose depression for tired people. Some respond to antidepressant treatment. For Ms. E, magnetic shoe inserts worked. She even returned to her karate class.

As a physician I prefer to understand as fully as possible the workings and applications of Magnetic Field Therapy. I study this in my own practice. I tell my patients about magnets, and I show them the Magnetic Field Therapy Handbook as a guide to usage. I have not had anyone say, “No thanks, I would rather suffer.” I am grateful to have Magnetic Field Therapy as a positive intervention for helping the patients in my medical practice.

……………….

Alternative Treatments for Chronic Pain

Magnet Therapy for Fibromyalgia

Magnetic Healing Does it work?

by Tom Edward

The idea of magnetic energy or magnetic therapy is centuries old. Legend has it that Cleopatra wore magnetic bracelets and necklaces for healing. Though actively employed by medical doctors in America in the 1800′s and early 1900′s, magnetic therapy eventually fell out of favor. But in the past decade, magnetic therapy has become a 100 million dollar a year industry in this country (magnetic therapy has long been used as an effective healing tool in China, France, India and Japan, especially in repairing soft-tissue injuries).

Studies on magnetic therapies in the Journal of Electro-and Magnetobiology led some pioneering doctors in this country to experiment with magnets in their practice. Their activities helped to standardize the use of some magnets, the magnet size and strength-in treating various conditions. The length of exposure to a magnet for healing certain ailments was also determined. Because of their work we know which magnets work most efficiently-for example, a magnet placed in one specific area of the body may not activate the entire body’s healing power, whereas sleeping on a magnetic bed pad radiates a magnetic field that can penetrate evenly into every part of the body and boost the entire immune system.

Through the growth of the magnetic therapy industry, different magnetic products have been designed which can be useful in treating many conditions. Some of the most commonly used magnetic products include the previously mentioned magnetic mattress which can alleviate insomnia, joint pain, muscle spasm and fibromyalgia. Magnetic inner soles for shoes are often helpful in relieving painful inflammation resulting from bone spurs, and for gout and to improve circulation. Magnetic pads and wraps which can be secured to the lower back, knees and elbows are recommended for arthritic joints, inflamed tendons and carpal tunnel syndrome.

WHAT IS A MAGNET?

In any material that is capable of being magnetized, there are groups of atoms with their own magnetic orientation arranged haphazardly in the material. When that material comes into contact with a strong magnetic field, it rearranges the groups of atoms so that they are in alignment. As the groups of atoms become aligned, they project a magnetic field.

Magnetic energy has different names. Some people call it energy or life force; the Chinese call it Chi, the Indians know it as Prana. Whatever you choose to call it, magnetic energy is a basic force of life-it pulses throughout the galaxies and is found everywhere in nature.

HOW DO MAGNETS HEAL THE BODY?

Some researchers and doctors say that magnets don’t actually heal the body. Science knows that the human body is composed of numerous cells that combine to form blood, tissues, bones and organs. These cells are in the constant state of renewing themselves. Dr. Robert Becker, one of the leading medical doctors who advocates the use of magnets in healing, believes that the force which stimulates ,cellular growth and division is electromagnetic energy.

He and other scientists contend that the charge on the cells of the body gets depleted as cells perform their normal daily functions and that the body tries to “recharge” the worn down cells by sending pulses of electromagnetic energy from the brain through the nervous system.

James Souder, President of Norso Biomagnetics in Raleigh, North Carolina, claims that studies performed on animals, and microscopic examination of blood vessels, indicate that capillarybloodflow is stimulated by the movement of magnetic fields through tissue and is the dominant factor in magnetic field therapy.

IS ALL MAGNETIC ENERGY HEALING?

No.

As previously stated, magnetic energy is a basic force of nature and necessary to all biological systems. Magnetic energy pulses from far-off galaxies; the sun showers us with magnetic fields. Our earth, itself a huge electromagnet with north and south poles, protects us from harmful cosmic radiation. Cosmic radiation is so potent that it is capable of penetrating a 12 foot thick block of lead. But it cannot penetrate the earth’s protective magnetic shield.

There is increasing evidence that there are harmful effects from high pulsating magnetic energy emitted from power transmission lines, TVs, radios, computers, microwaves and myriad electric appliances. The ordinary 60 cycle alternating electromagnetic fields created by technology seem to exert stress on the body’s cellular level. It is reported that they can cause memory loss, headaches, changes in heartbeat and blood chemistry. Melatonin production can be reduced, and the brain’s electromagnetic signals to the cells can be blocked, diluting the body’s disease-fighting ability.

Studies of exposure to alternating electromagnetic fields have shown mutagenic effects, cancer cell promotion and a lowering of the body’s pH to a more acidic level.

In addition, energy deprivation caused by living in concrete buildings also appears to have negative effects on the body. Dr. Kyochi Nakagawa, Director of Isuzu Hospital in Tokyo says that “Magnetic Field Deficiency Syndrome,” produces symptoms such as headaches, back and neck pains, insomnia, heaviness of head and general lassitude.

USING MAGNETIC ENERGY BENEFICIALLY

While there are many applications claimed for magnetics from the reduction of scar tissue to the treatment of internal organs, the predominant use of magnetic devices is the treatment of musculoskeletal pain and myofacial pain. While, as previously stated, the mechanism by which this pain relief occurs is subject to much conjecture, there is a consensus that heightened blood flow to the area under the footprint of the magnet is one of the primary results of magnetic treatment. The results have been demonstrated by both thermographic and nuclear medicine studies. There have also been evidence of pain blocking phenomena in certain nerve fibers related to the application of magnetic fields. And researchers have been able to demonstrate changes in the electrical potential of nerve cells which raise the threshold for transmitting pain impulses as a result of magnetic fields.

Some scientists subscribe to the “Hall Effect,” which promotes the idea that ions in the blood are manipulated by magnetic fields thus producing a heating effect in the magnetized area and increasing blood circulation. James Souder disagrees, and insists that “from a biological perspective, magnets activate or turn on capillaries creating extra blood supply at the cellular level as opposed to the older notion that magnets produce a local heating effect to stimulate blood supply which is essentially what the Hall effect is about.”

Dr. Dean Bonlie, Chairman of the Scientific Committee of the North American Academy of Magnetic Therapy, explains that when the body is fatigued, a “loss of static charge” on the body’s cells causes a “clumping of red blood cells.” Through magnetic field supplementation, he says, chemical reactions are enhanced, building up the charge on cell walls which cause the cells to repel each other, reducing the clumping. With more surface area available, he says, the oxygen-carrying capacity of the cells is increased which in turn reinvigorates the body.

Another source of disagreement among magnetic therapy advocates is the healing quality of negative and positive poles. Such prominent voices in the magnetic therapy movement as Dr. Philpott say that “there are distinct and opposite effects of the two separate magnetic poles on metabolic function…in terms of biological response, the separate negative and positive polarities are as distinctly opposite as day and night, hot and cold, and acid and alkali.” Dr. Philpott claims that his clinical observations show that negative magnetic field energy should be used to fight infection, normalize acid base balance, increase cellular oxygen and reduce fluid retention. He claims that using positive magnetic field energy can actually decrease cellular oxygen, accelerate microorganism growth and result in acidic metabolic response. James Joseph, an independent research consultant for Optimal Living Associates, agrees with Dr. Philpott.

Dr. Philpott concluded that positive magnetic field energy creates an acidic condition in the tissue and negative magnetic field energy creates alkalinity after performing before and after saliva tests on patients being treated with a whole-body negative magnetic field. Dr. Bonlie, in a similar test, found that patients who had tested over-alkaline in pre-testing became more acidic, indicating that whole body treatment with a negative magnetic field brings normalcy from either end of the spectrum. Dr. Bonlie claimed that this happened because of “simple rules of physics.” “When an atom is placed in an increased magnetic field,” says Dr. Bonlie, “the charge is increased on the atom for a fraction of a second. This increase in energy is expressed by an increase in the velocity of some of the orbiting electrons and protons. In the case of paired electrons, one is sped up and the other slowed down. This imbalance causes a phenomenon known in physics as precession (wobble). This is much like increased molecular action which takes place from heating a solution to make a chemical reaction take place. Precession causes electron transfer which is the basis of all chemical reactions in the body. In summary, when the magnetic field is increased in which the atoms of the body exist, body chemistry is enhanced, assisting it in normalcy which improves body performance and healing.”

While the physics of magnetic energy is debated, its benefits are being experienced by people around the country. Dr. Ronald Lawrence of Agoura Hills, California asserts that magnets have been extremely effective in the control of arthritic pain in many of his patients. Dee Massengale, an exercise physiologist in Atlanta, Georgia suffering with fibromyaglia since 1982, says that of all the therapies she’s tried magnetic devices have been one of the most valuable tools for pain management.

In one of our own experiments, Anne Ziselman of Hollywood, Florida slept with magnet wraps strapped above her kneecap. She reported a reduction of arthritic swelling and a softening of the inflammation after four nights of use. “Sometimes the swelling goes away by itself, but the only times my knee has softened was when I had a cortisone shot,” said Mrs. Ziselman.

…………………………

Magnetic Fields for Migraines? Recent Studies Show Promise, New Study Underway

This can all be found at:

the rion resarch.com
http://www.therionresearch.com/learning_center_articles.html#5

========================

Magnet Therapy

Stewart G. Eidelson, M.D.
SpineUniverse Founder, Orthopaedic Surgeon
Orthopaedic Surgery Associates
Boca Raton, FL, USA

“So many of my patients ask about magnet therapy to treat back and neck pain. Although I do not endorse magnet therapy, as a service to patients, the following information is provided.” – Stewart G. Eidelson, M.D.

Using magnets for healing pain is increasingly popular with the public. However, despite this popularity, there is a lack of scientific evidence to prove magnets have any therapeutic benefit. Traditional physicians remain, in general, very skeptical of magnets’ benefits. Despite this justified mainstream skepticism, the following article seeks to provide members of the public who are seeking information on magnets with balanced, factual information.

When referring to magnets, we are not talking about the type of magnets found on refrigerator doors – but biomagnets – those magnets manufactured for physical and mental healing. Biomagnets are named after biomagnetism, the science of magnetism.

As children in school we learned that magnetism is an energy force on earth. Each atom has a nucleus around which spins positively charged protons and negatively charged electrons that generate a magnetic field. For thousands of years ancient civilizations studied the positive and negative magnetic forces. For example, in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) it is believed that a balance of these positive and negative forces referred to as Yin and Yang represents good health.

Theory

Although not scientifically proven and controversial, theories suggest biomagnets alone do not heal but rather stimulate the body to heal naturally. Some of these scientifically unproven claims include:

-Restoration of cellular magnetic balance
-Migration of calcium ions is accelerated to help heal bones and nerve tissues
-Circulation is enhanced since biomagnets are attracted to the iron in blood and this increase in blood flow helps healing
-Biomagnets have a positive effect on the pH balance of cells
-Hormone production is influenced by biomagnet use

Polarity

Theory aside, an important aspect of biomagnet use is magnet polarity. This relates to the direction in which the magnet is placed. The North Pole corresponds to TCM Yin, or negative polarity. The South Pole corresponds to TCM Yang, or positive polarity. In the chart below, the magnetic influences of the South and North Poles are shown by example:

———-North Pole———-

Characteristic: Sedating, Cooling

Negative – Yin
Low back pain
Arthritis
Inflammation
Acute headaches
Sharp pain

———-South Pole———-

Characteristics:Stimulating, Heating

Positive – Yang
Tingling
Numbness
Weak muscles
Paralysis
Scars

If the body appears to lack both positive and negative energies to heal, the therapist may apply both the North and South Poles (known as Bipolar) simultaneously. Bipolar biomagnet therapy may be used to heal fractures or treat chronic pain.

The type of ailment determines the type and power of the biomagnet to be used, the length of time the patient has had the problem, its severity, if the ailment is superficial or deep, the area of the body to be treated, and the patient’s sensitivity.

Some patients are sensitive to biomagnet therapy. The therapy may temporarily make the condition worse as toxins are released. Light-headedness, headache, sleepiness, and itching are some of the side effects.

Biomagnets Not for Everyone’s Use

As with any treatment, there are cautionary measures to follow. For example, biomagnets should not be used during pregnancy, on patients with a history of epilepsy, while taking blood-thinning medications, on bleeding wounds, or if internal bleeding exists.

Biomagnets should never be used on a patient with a pacemaker or who have metal implants that could be dislodged by magnet use.

In infants and children care should be taken as well as use on the eyes, brain, or over the heart at any age.

Biomagnet Power Measured

Biomagnet power is measured in terms of gauss, the line of force per unit area of the pole. The earth’s surface is approximately 0.5 gauss. Many manufacturers rate their products using internal gauss and external gauss to indicate strength. Listed below are typical magnetic strength classifications:

Low gauss (g) = 300 – 700 g

Medium gauss = 1000 – 2500 g

High gauss = 3000 – 6000 g

Super gauss = 7000 – 12000 g

Surface gauss rating also refers to the external strength of the magnet. This measurement is dependent on the size, shape, polarity, and grade of the magnetic material.

Some experts in biomagnet therapy begin treatment at low gauss and gradually increase strength as necessary.

We recommend you consult with a specialist who is skilled in administering biomagnet therapy first.

Types of Biomagnets

There are about as many types of biomagnets as there are body parts! Magnetic mattresses and pads are designed to be slept on, magnetic insoles fit inside shoes, block magnets can be placed under mattresses, pillows, or seat cushions, back supports are even available with slots for magnet insertion. Others are made as body wraps with Velcro closures, jewelry, and magnetic foil.

Caring for Biomagnets

Most biomagnets are made of ferrites, which are iron oxides combined with cobalt, nickel, barium and other metals to make a ceramic-like material. The flexible types of magnets are combined with plastic, rubber or other pliable materials. The strongest biomagnets are those made from neodymium (rare earth element).

However, just because biomagnets are strong does not mean they are indestructible! When subjected to intense heat (400+ degrees F) a magnet will lose all its energy. Also, don’t drop magnets.

And remember, magnets can damage CDs, computer hard drives, credit cards, and other devices with metal components.

Conclusion

Biomagnets claim to be relatively safe, non-invasive, 100% natural, and drug free. Some manufacturers claim their magnets work fast and even offer guarantees. Many patients have reported significant improvement in back pain and other ailments with biomagnet use. However, there remains a lack of scientific data to validate the efficacy of magnets, and accordingly, very few doctors of medicine (MDs) are know to prescribe magnets for the treatment of spinal disorders.

As with any new treatment, we recommend discussing your condition with specialists who can present the argument for the therapy, and with those who are against the therapy, to provide you with a balanced picture upon which to base your decision.

Editorial Comment: The editorial staff at spineuniverse.com tries to be open-minded to alternative treatments but will not fully support magnet therapy until “doubled blinded” studies are initiated that scientifically support the value of magnet products for back care. It would be very easy to set up these studies and we challenge the Industry to report their findings from “controlled” studies without prejudice.

========================

The Skeptics Corner
…………………..

Magnet therapy

The Skeptics Dictionary

“I know of no scientist who takes this claim seriously…It’s another fad. They come and go like copper bracelets and crystals and all of these things, and this one will pass too.” –Robert Park of the American Physical Society.

“Iron atoms in a magnet are crammed together in a solid state about one atom apart from one another. In your blood only four iron atoms are allocated to each hemoglobin molecule, and they are separated by distances too great to form a magnet. This is easily tested by pricking your finger and placing a drop of your blood next to a magnet. ” –Michael Shermer*

Magnet therapy is a type of “alternative” medicinewhich claims that magnetic fields have healing powers. Some claim that magnets can help broken bones heal faster, but most of the advocacy comes from those who claim that magnets relieve pain. Most of the support for these notions is in the form of testimonials and anecdotes, and can be attributed to “placebo effects and other effects accompanying their use” (Livingston 1998). There is almost no scientific evidence supporting magnet therapy. One highly publicized exception is a double-blind study done at Baylor College of Medicine which compared the effects of magnets and sham magnets on the knee pain of 50 post-polio patients. The experimental group reported a significantly greater reduction in pain than the control group. No replication of the study has yet been done.

A less publicized study at the New York College of Podiatric Medicine found that magnets did not have any effect on healing heel pain. Over a 4-week period, 19 patients wore a molded insole containing a magnetic foil, while 15 patients wore the same type of insole with no magnetic foil. In both groups, 60% reported improvement.

Despite the fact that there has been virtually no scientific testing of magnet therapy, a growing industry is producing magnetic bracelets, bands, insoles, back braces, mattresses, etc., and claiming miraculous powers for their products. The magnet market may be approaching $150 million annually (Collie). (Lerner claims that U.S. sales are near the half billion mark and that world-wide magnetic therapy is bringing in nearly twice as much.) Magnets are becoming the gimmick of choice of chiropractors and other “pain specialists.” Former potter Marlynn Chetkof sells Russell Biomagnetic products and advises that magnets are better than painkillers or living with pain (Collie). Even a bankrupt building contractor, Rick Jones, is trying to cash in on the current magnet craze. He has formed a company called Optimum Health Technologies, Inc. to market his “Magnassager,” a hand-held vibrator with magnets retailing for $489. Jones claims his invention “isn’t just another massage device.” He says it uses an electromagnetic field to help circulate blood while it’s massaging the muscles. Jones raised $300,000 from investors and spent it all on “product development and marketing.” Not a cent was spent on scientific testing of the device before bringing it to market, though he did give $20,000 to a physiologist to evaluate his device “to make sure that it was not gimmicky” (Kasler).

The claim that magnets help “circulate blood” is a common one among supporters of magnet therapy, but there is no scientific evidence that magnets do anything to the blood. Even though the evidence is lacking that magnets have anything other than a placebo effect, theories abound as to how they work. Some say magnets are like a shiatsu massage; some claim magnets affect the iron in red blood cells; still others claim that magnets create an alkaline reaction in the body (Collie). Bill Roper, head of Magnetherapy claims that “Magnets don’t cure or heal anything. All they do is set your body back to normal so the healing process can begin” (Collie). How he knows this is not clear.

Some supporters of magnetic therapy seem to base their belief on a metaphysical assumption that all illness is due to some sort of imbalance or disharmony in energy. The balance or flow of electromagnetic energy must be restored to restore health, and magnets are thought to be able to do this.

The most rabid advocates of magnet therapy are athletes such as Jim Colbert and John Huston (golfers), Dan Marino (football) and Lindsay Davenport (tennis). Their beliefs are based on little more than post hoc reasoning. It is possible that the relief a magnetic belt gives to a golfer with a back problem, however, is not simply a function of the placebo effect or the regressive fallacy. It may well be due to the support or added heat the belt provides. The product might work just as well without the magnets. However, athletes are not given to scientific testing any more than are the manufacturers of magnetic gimmickry.

Athletes aren’t the only ones enamored of the power of magnets to heal. Dr. Richard Rogachefsky, an orthopedic surgeon at the University of Miami, claims to have used magnets on about 600 patients, including people who have been shot. He says that the magnets “accelerate the healing process.” His evidence? He can tell by looking at X-rays. Dr. William Jarvis is skeptical. He says that “Any doctor who relies on clinical impressions, on what they think they see, is a fool” (Collie). There is a good reason scientists do controlled double-blind studies to test causal efficacy: to prevent self-deception.

Dr. Mark S. George, an associate professor of psychiatry, neurology and radiology at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, did a controlled experiment on the use of magnets to treat depression. He only studied twelve patients for two weeks, however, so his results are of little significance.

While sales of magnetic products keep rising, there are a few scientific studies going on. The University of Virginia is testing magnets on sufferers of fibromyalgia. The Universities of Miami and Kentucky are testing magnets on people with carpal tunnel syndrome (Collie). At present, however, we have no good reason to believe that magnets have any more healing power than crystals or copper bracelets.

See related entries on alternative medicine, the post hoc fallacy, and the regressive fallacy.

further reading

Magnet study contradicts “increased circulation” claim – Quackwatch newsletter 9/17/2002
Magnets Unplugged by Sharon Lerner (Village Voice, March 2001)
Magnetic and Electromagnetic Therapy by David W. Ramey, DVM
Magnet Therapy by Dr. Stephen Barrett
“Why Bogus Therapies Often Seem to Work” by Barry L. Beyerstein, Ph.D.
“Magnetize Your Beverages” by Stephen Barrett, M.D.
Magnet Therapy Relieves Post-Polio Pain
Revolutionary New Insoles Combine Five Forms Of Pseudoscience
Biomagnetic Pseudoscience and Nonsense Claims by Miguel A. Sabadell
Little Scientific Basis for Magnets’ Pain Relief by Don Colburn
Magnetic Water and Fuel Treatment: Myth, Magic, or Mainstream Science? by Mike R. Powell, Skeptical Inquirer, Jan/Feb 1998.
Study on Magnet Therapy Shows Limited Potential for Pain Relief
Collie, Ashley Jude. “Let the Force Be With You,” American Way, March 15, 1999.
Franklin, Benjamin and Antoine Lavoisier. “Report of the Commissioners Charged by the King to Examine Animal Magnetism” (reprinted in an English translation in Skeptic, Vol. 4, No. 3). The report was instituted by French king Louis XVI in 1784.
Kasler, Dale. “Inside Business,” Sacramento Bee, June 29, 1998.
Livingston, James D. “Magnetic Therapy: Plausible Attraction?” Skeptical Inquirer (July/August1998).
Livingston, James D. Driving Force: The Natural Magic of Magnets (Harvard University Press, 1997).

http://skepdic.com/magnetic.html

……………………….

Magnet Therapy

Stephen Barrett, M.D.

During the past few years, magnetic devices have been claimed to relieve pain and to have therapeutic value against a large number of diseases and conditions. The way to evaluate such claims is to ask whether scientific studies have been published. Pulsed electromagnetic fields — which induce measurable electric fields — have been demonstrated effective for treating slow-healing fractures and have shown promise for a few other conditions. However, few studies have been published on the effect on pain of small, static magnets marketed to consumers [1].

Explanations that magnetic fields “increase circulation,” “reduce inflammation,” or “speed recovery from injuries” are simplistic and are not supported by the weight of experimental evidence [2].

The main basis for the claims is a double-blind test study, conducted at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, which compared the effects of magnets and sham magnets on knee pain. The study involved 50 adult patients with pain related to having been infected with the polio virus when they were children. A static magnetic device or a placebo device was applied to the patient’s skin for 45 minutes. The patients were asked to rate how much pain they experienced when a “trigger point was touched.” The researchers reported that the 29 patients exposed to the magnetic device achieved lower pain scores than did the 21 who were exposed to the placebo device [3}

Although this study is cited by nearly everyone selling magnets, it provides no legitimate basis for concluding that magnets offer any health-related benefit:

Although the groups were said to be selected randomly, the ratio of women to men in the experimental group was twice that of the control group. If women happen to be more responsive to placebos than men, a surplus of women in the "treatment" group would tend to improve that group's score.

The age of the placebo group was four years higher than that of the control group. If advanced age makes a person more difficult to treat, the "treatment" group would again have a scoring advantage.
The investigators did not measure the exact pressure exerted by the blunt object at the trigger point before and after the study.

Even if the above considerations have no significance, the study should not be extrapolated to suggest that other types of pain can be relieved by magnets.

There was just one brief exposure and no systematic follow-up of patients. Thus there was no way to tell whether any improvement would be more than temporary.

The authors themselves acknowledge that the study was a "pilot study." Pilot studies are done to determine whether it makes sense to invest in a larger more definitive study. They never provide a legitimate basis for marketing any product as effective against any symptom or health problem.

Two better-designed, longer-lasting pain studies have been negative:

Researchers at the New York College of Podiatric Medicine have reported negative results in a study of patients with heel pain. Over a 4-week period, 19 patients wore a molded insole containing a magnetic foil, while 15 patients wore the same type of insole with no magnetic foil. In both groups, 60% reported improvement, which suggests that the magnetic foil conveyed no benefit [4].

More recently, researchers at the VA Medical Center in Prescott, Arizona conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study involving 20 patients with chronic back pain. Each patient was exposed to real and sham bipolar permanent magnets during alternate weeks, for 6 hours per day, 3 days per week for a week, with a 1-week period between the treatment weeks. No difference in pain or mobility was found between the treatment and sham-treatment periods [5].

Magnets have also been claimed to increase circulation. This claim is false. If it were true, placing a magnet on the skin would make the area under the magnet become red, which it does not. Moreover, a well-designed study that actually measured blood flow has found no increase. The study involved 12 healthy volunteers who were exposed to either a 1000-gauss magnetic disk or an identically appearing disk that was not magnetic. No change in the amount or speed of blood flow was observed when either disk was applied to their arm. [6]. The magnets were manufactured by Magnetherapy, Inc, of Riviera Beach, Florida, a company that has been subjected to two regulatory actions.

Legal and Regulatory Actions

In 1998, Magnetherapy, Inc., signed an Assurance of Voluntary Compliance with the State of Texas to pay a $30,000 penalty and to stop claiming that wearing its magnetic device near areas of pain and inflammation will relieve pain due to arthritis, migraine headaches, sciatica or heel spurs. The agreement also requires Magnetherapy to stop making claims that its magnets can cure, treat, or mitigate any disease or can affect any change in the human body, unless its devices are FDA-approved for those purposes [7]. Ads for the company’s Tectonic Magnets had featured testimonials from athletes, including golfers from the senior pro tours. Various ads had claimed that Tectonic Magnets would provide symptomatic relief from certain painful conditions and could restore range of motion to muscles and joints. The company had provided retailers with display packages that included health claims, written testimonials, and posters of sports stars. Texas Attorney General Dan Morales stated that some claims were false or unsubstantiated and others had rendered the product unapproved medical devices under Texas law. In 1997, the FDA had warned Magnetherapy to stop claiming that its products would relieve arthritis; tennis elbow; low back pain; sciatica; migraine headache; muscle soreness; neck, knee, ankle, and shoulder pain; heel spurs; bunions; arthritic fingers and toes; and could reduce pain and inflammation in the affected areas by increasing blood and oxygen flow .

In 1999, the FTC obtained a consent agreement barring two companies from making unsubstantiated claims about their magnetic products. Magnetic Therapeutic Technologies, of Irving, Texas, is barred from claiming that its magnetic sleep pads or other products: (a) are effective against cancers, diabetic ulcers, arthritis, degenerative joint conditions, or high blood pressure; (b) could stabilize or increase the T-cell count of HIV patients; (c) could reduce muscle spasms in persons with multiple sclerosis; (d) could reduce nerve spasms associated with diabetic neuropathy; (e) could increase bone density, immunity, or circulation; or (f) are comparable or superior to prescription pain medicine. Pain Stops Here! Inc., of Baiting Hollow, N.Y., may no longer claim that its “magnetized water” or other products are useful against cancer, diseases of the liver or other internal organs, gallstones, kidney stones, urinary infection, gastric ulcers, dysentery, diarrhea, skin ulcers, bed sores, arthritis, bursitis, tendinitis, sprains, strains, sciatica, heart disease, circulatory disease, arthritis, auto-immune illness, neuro-degenerative disease, and allergies, and could stimulate the growth of plants.

On August 8, 2000, the Consumer Justice Center, of Laguna Niguel, California filed suit in Orange County Superior Court charging that Florsheim and a local shoe store (Shoe Emporium) made false and fraudulent claims that their MagneForce shoes (a) correct “magnetic deficiency,” (b) “generate a deep-penetrating magnetic field which increases blood circulation; reduces leg and back fatigue; and provides natural pain relief and improved energy level.”; and (c) their claims are established and proven by scientific studies [9]. A few days after this suit was filed, Florsheim removed the disputed ad from its Web site.

In 2001, Richard Markoll, his wife Ernestine, David H. Trock, M.D., and Bio-Magnetic Treatment Systems (BMTS) pled guilty to criminal charges in connection with a scheme involving pulsed magnetic therapy. The participants used fraudulent billing codes to seek payment from Medicare and three other insurance plans for treatment with a device (Electro-Magnetic Induction Treatment System, Model 30/30) that lacked FDA approval [10]. The treatments — called pulsed signal therapy (PST) — were administered in a clinical trial on an investigational basis not approved by the FDA. The Markolls were sentenced to 3 years probation, a $4,000 fine and a $100 special assessment. Ernestine Markoll was sentenced to 2 years probation, a $1,000 fine and a $25 special assessment. Magnetic Therapy, was sentenced to a 1-day summary probation and a $200 special assessment. The Markolls also signed a civil settlement under which they agreed to pay the U.S Government $4 million [11]. The device was invented by Richard Markoll, MD, PhD, who does not have a medical license but is described in Web site biographies as a graduate of Grace University School of Medicine, a Caribbean medical school. Trock, a former principal investigator for Magnetic Therapy Center, PC, Danbury, CT, was sentenced to 6 months probation. and ordered to make restitution of $35,250 [12]. Trock has co-authored studies claiming that PST is effective for treating pain, but the device is not FDA-approved for that purpose.

In September 2002, California Attorney General Bill Lockyer charged Florida-based European Health Concepts, Inc. (EHC) with making false and misleading claims about its magnetic mattress pads and seat cushions. The complaint, filed in Sacramento Superior Court, also named EHC president Kevin Todd and several sales managers and agents as defendants. The suit seeks more than $1 million in civil penalties for engaging in unfair business practices and making false claims; $500,000 in civil penalties for transactions involving senior citizens; and full restitution for purchasers of the products. The complaint alleged that prospective customers, primarily senior citizens, were invited to attend a free dinner seminar at which they were told that EHC’s products could help people suffering from fibromyalgia, lupus, sciatica, herniated discs, asthma, bronchitis, cataracts, chronic fatigue syndrome, colitis, diverticulitis, heart disease, multiple sclerosis, and more than 50 other health conditions. The sales agents offered phony price discounts for immediate purchases that actually were the company’s regular prices. [13].

The Commissioner called Dr. Philip Neufeld of Health Canada’s Medical Devices Bureau as a witness. He explained that, under the Regulations, a product is considered a Class I medical device as long
as someone makes a representation that it has a medical attribute. A product is designated as a Class I medical device because the manufacturer claims that it has medical benefits, not because Health Canada agrees with the claims or the manufacturer has proven them. All that a manufacturer has to do is supply the required identifying information and declare that its product is safe and effective for the purposes claimed; it is not required to submit any evidence that this is the case.

The Bottom Line

There is no scientific basis to conclude that small, static magnets can relieve pain or influence the course of any disease. In fact, many of today’s products produce no significant magnetic field at or beneath the skin’s surface.

References

Livingston JD. Magnetic therapy: Plausible attraction. Skeptical Inquirer 25-30, 58, 1998.
Ramey DW. Magnetic and electromagnetic therapy. Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine 2(1):13-19, 1998.
Vallbona C, Hazelwood CF, Jurida G. Response of pain to static magnetic fields in postpolio patients: A double-blind pilot study. Archives of Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine 78:1200-1203, 1997.
Caselli MA and others. Evaluation of magnetic foil and PPT Insoles in the treatment of heel pain. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 87:11-16, 1997.
Collacott EA and others. Bipolar permanent magnets for the treatment of chronic low back pain. JAMA 283:1322-1325, 2000.
Mayrovitz HN and others. Assessment of the short-term effects of a permanent magnet on normal skin blood circulation via laser-Doppler flowmetry. Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine 6(1):9-12, 2002.
Morales halts unproven claims for magnet therapy. News release, April 9, 1998.
Gill LJ. Letter to William L. Roper, Feb 3, 1997.
Jeff Wynton and the Consumer Justice Center v. Florsheim Group, Inc., Shoe Emporium. Superior Court of California, Orange County, Case #00CC09419, filed Aug 8, 2000.
Burns EB. Omnibus ruling on defendants’ motion to strike and motions to dismiss. United States of America v Richard Markoll, Ernestine Binder Markoll, and Bio-Magnetic Systems, Inc. U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut, No. 3:00cr133(EBB), Jan 2001.
Defense Criminal Investigative Service press release, Aug, 2001.
Defense Criminal Investigative Service press release, June, 2001.
Barrett S. California Attorney General sues magnetic mattress pad sellers. Quackwatch, Sept 24, 2002.

http://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/QA/magnet.html

===========================

Join us as we work for lymphedema patients everywehere:

Advocates for Lymphedema

Dedicated to be an advocacy group for lymphedema patients. Working towards education, legal reform, changing insurance practices, promoting research, reaching for a cure.

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AdvocatesforLymphedema/

Subscribe: AdvocatesforLymphedema-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

Pat O’Connor

Advocates for Lymphedema


Posted by Pat in 15:16:36 | Permalink | Comments Off

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Mesotherapy

Mesotherapy

Mesotherapy, which is classfied as an alternative medical treatment and still highly experimental with lymphedema is the injection of hyaluronidase or similar substances into the lymphedemous limb. The claim is that this injection helps loosen the extracellularmatrix, thereby encouraging lymphatic flow is of doubfult therapeutic value to our condition.

I personally, have serious reservations on the procedure because like so many of the “new” treatments, there are no clinical studies, blind, double-blind or otherwise to substantiate its claim.

Furthermore, it is an invasive procedure, thereby opening the door to an entry location for bacteria and subsequent infection, cellulitis or lymphangitis. It is imperative with any invasive procedure that the attending physician have a clear understanding of the pathophysiology of lymphedema and the ramifications of exposing their patient to potential infections.

It was/is recommended by its supporters as highly effective against cellulite and/or weight. Yet, even in this area, the treatment is high controversial and not of proven benefit. Infact, Dr. Ben Krentzman, a highly respected physician who focuses on weight and obesity and who publishes an online newsletter, “The Krentzman Obesity Newsletter,” flatly states he does not recommend it.

This page is an update to the original page I posted in 2004. Since that time the medical literature has literally exploded with studies and articles involving serious and significant complications associated with mesotherapy.

I can not stress the importance of anyone considering under going this treatment to carefully read the added links below.

Disclaimer: This is presented for information only. Inclusion does not constitute an endorsement of the therapies and/or treatment. Individuals should consult with their physcians as to itts apllicability in their personal situation.

WHAT IS MESOTHERAPY?

Mesotherapy is the practice of injecting small amounts of medication and/or vitamins into the mesoderm — or middle layer of skin.

The technique was pioneered in France by Dr. Michel Pistor, and has been performed there since 1952. There are some 15,000 mesotherapy practitioners in France. There are far fewer practitioners in the United States, and there is no single certification process for performing the therapy.

Mesotherapy has been used in the treatment of acne, arthritis and joint problems, sports injuries as well as for cosmetic purposes, such as reducing cellulite and weightloss. While each mesotherapy treatment may involve hundreds of small injections, the treatment sessions typically take only minutes to complete.

Some of the drugs Dr. Bissoon and other mesotherapists inject include aminophylline, an asthma medication, and isopreteranol, a cardiac medicine. Both are FDA-approved, but not for cosmetic use. Many, including Dr. Bissoon also use phosphatidylcholine, which is not an FDA-approved drug in injectible form. It is manufactured in a compounding pharmacy. Others use phosphatidylcholine in a European drug called Lipostabil, which the FDA also has not approved.

The number of mesotherapy treatments needed depends on a number of factors: the severity of the condition, the cause of the problem are chief among them. Response to therapy is generally seen after three to five sessions. Long-term, chronic conditions such as cellulite and wrinkles, may require at least 15 sessions. Sports injuries and acute conditions may require only one to three therapy sessions.

Cost of the treatments vary. The price of a single session can cost several hundred dollars.

Courtesy of ABC News

For the entire articles, which includes sections:

What is Mesotherapy?
Two Patients’ Progress
Is it Safe?
Where Does the Fat Go?

MESOTHERAPY

THE LASTING ANSWER TO CELLULITE AND FOCAL WEIGHT MELTING

LOSE YOUR DOUBLE CHINS” WITH MESO AND LOOK WONDERFUL

CELLULITE

According to recent research, 95 percent of women suffer from cellulite. Not that they’re the only ones. Less common perhaps, but men suffer from it to. So what is cellulite? Cellulite results from a combination of fatty tissue and fluid retention. Typically (although not exclusively) a female problem, it can affect women of all ages irrespective of their weight. In women, fat cells on the lower part of the body store fat six times more readily than those on the upper body. They also release them six times less readily. This makes weight loss from the lower body almost impossible without the upper body suffering unnecessarily. The answer? Mesotherapy.

MESOTHERAPY

Originally a medical technique devised in 1958 by Frenchman Dr Michel Pistor to treat such conditions as Rhumatology, Sports Traumatology, Infectious diseases, Vascular diseases and the improvement of circulation, Mesotherapy has subsequently been extremely successful in the treatment of aesthetic conditions. Cellulite/Orange Peel Effect and Weight loss can be effectively managed with the use of Mesotherapy. The treatment stimulates the mesoderm, or middle layer of the skin, which in turn helps to disburse the cellulite.

THE TREATMENT

Mesotherapy involves injecting small amounts of homeopathic medicine immediately beneath the surface of the skin to break down the cellulite and to improve circulation and lymphatic and venous drainage. Each treatment takes about ten minutes and is not painful. After the treatment you can return to normal activities. The addition of Vitamin C to the mixture encourages the tone and quality of the overlying skin. Treatment may be carried out immediately after an initial consultation at which point you will be informed as to how many treatments you will require. Micro-injections are given twice a week over a period of 4 to 8 weeks. Some individuals may require a course of 4 weeks, although a full treatment course takes 8 weeks. The treatment is long lasting and the results measurable. When the desired effects are achieved, all that is required is annual maintenance over a 4-6 week period. Superb results are achieved and those being treated look and feel better both during and after treatment. Overall, with a moderate amount of lifestyle change,

Mesotherapy can provide measurable improvements with people losing up to 2cm from the circumference of their thighs after only 6 sessions. Read more about specific uses for mesotherapy below Weight Loss For those patients seeking weight loss, mesotherapy is a revolutionary and essential tool. This is how it works: the biology of the fat cell is modified by blocking the signals of fat accumulation and simultaneously triggering the release of stored fat. Again, the desired area of treatment can be patient specific, targeting your most problematic areas. Additionally, a complete dietary and nutrient evaluation will help you maintain your weight loss goals. Cellulite Reduction Cellulite affects the majority of women over the age 20. It is caused by poor circulation, fat herniation, a weakening of connective tissues, lymphatic congestion and hormonal imbalances. Cellulite is classified into four stages, based upon its appearance while standing, laying, and pinching the skin. Causing a dimpling and cottage cheese appearance of the skin, cellulite is not a disease of excess weight. Mesotherapy treatment is targeted to correct these problems by improving circulation, strengthening connective tissues, and dissolving excess fat.

Hair Regrowth / Alopecia Alopecia, the loss of hair, affects both men and women. Alopecia results from poor circulation, nutritional imbalances, and the excess of a hormone known as DHT (dihydrotestosterone). Mesotherapy can correct these problems, stimulating the body to naturally grow lost hair. Face and Neck Rejuvenation / Mesolift Aging, sagging and wrinkling of the skin occurs from accumulation of fat, loss of skin elasticity and excessive free radical damage. Using antioxidants and amino acids, mesotherapy can remove fat from under the neck, remove free radical damage, and tighten loose skin. The effects rejuvenate the face, eyelids, and neck without the unnatural appearance and painful recovery of surgical face lifting. Body Sculpting Contouring of the abdomen, arms, back, legs and hands can be obtained with mesotherapy.

Vitamins and amino acids are used to tighten sagging skin while other agents are used to remove areas of fat, restoring a more youthful and athletic appearance to the body’s contours. Medical uses Mesotherapy also has a variety of medicinal uses. Treatments can benefit those patients suffering from muscle spasms, stress, insomnia, carpal tunnel syndrome, fibromyalgia, infections, RSD (reflex sympathetic dystrophy), and osteoarthritis, among other conditions. Such a wide variety of conditions can be treated with this technique as each treatment is formulated to meet each patient’s unique problem. Mesotherapy is administered only into the problematic area, avoiding the side-effects of taking oral medications. For example, the dosage of medication used to alleviate the pain of osteoarthritis is approximately 1/50th of the comparable to the equivalent oral dose taken over a one-week period. Mesotherapy: Cosmetic uses Medical Uses · Weight Loss · Cellulite Removal · Face and Neck Rejuvenation · Hair Loss / Alopecia · Help in Quitting Smoking · Arthritis Pain · Carpal Tunnel Syndrome · Muscle Relaxation · Help with Anxiety and Insomnia · Chronic Infections · Bone Spurs Dr. M. Pistor originated the technique of Mesotherapy in France in 1952. It is commonly practiced in France, where more than 15,000 practitioners utilize Mesotherapy for the care of their patients. Mesotherapy is also practiced in many other countries around the world, including Belgium, Columbia, Argentina, and throughout Europe.

Mesotherapy is an interventional natural medicine technique.

Mesotherapy must be performed by a licensed health care clinician who is permitted to do injections. At our office, Caring Medical and Rehabilitation Services, this includes the physicians, physician assistants, and nurses. The technique involves the injection of substances to stimulate the mesoderm for various biological purposes. For instance, if the mesoderm circulation is poor, a vasodilator is used; if excessive inflammation is present, an anti-inflammatory medication is used; or if inflammation/stimulation is needed; a fibroblast proliferating solution is injected. Conditions such as cellulite are due to lymph venolymphatic insufficiency, therefore a stimulator of venous and lymph flow is used. We use natural plant extracts whenever possible; however, traditional pharmacologic agents are sometimes required. Top Uses for Mesotherapy The compounds injected into the mesoderm during Mesotherapy depend upon the pathophysiology of the disease process. In general, the substances fall into the following classes: vasodilators, anti-inflammatories, muscle relaxants, decontractants (reduce contractures), proteolytic enzymes, biologics (including vitamins, minerals, and plant extracts), vaccines, anti-infectants, hormones, hormone blockers, general medicine physiologics, and anesthetics.

Mesotherapy is effective for a multitude of conditions because it helps reverse the physiology of that condition. In rheumatoid arthritis, for example, plant and pharmacologic agents are used to control inflammation; whereas connective tissue stimulators (such as silica, biotin, and proteolytic enzymes) that promote inflammation and healing would be given to the athlete with a ligament tear or degenerated tendon. The pathophysiology is multifactorial in many conditions, therefore, multiple agents are used. (See Figure 2.) Top Figure 2: Many different pharmacological and natural agents are used during Mesotherapy. Pharmacological Class Agent Purpose Vasodilator Pentoxifyilline Increase circulation NSAID Toradol Anti-inflammatory CNS sedative Norflex Muscle relaxant Enzymes Hyaluronic Acid Decrease scar tissue Nutrients Biotin Stimulate repair Vaccines Bacterial Proteins Stimulate immune system Antibiotics Metronidazole Anti-infection Hormones Progesterone Hormone replacement Hormone blockers Fioesteride Hair growth General medicines Compazine Correct physiology Anesthetics Procaine Increase circulation Calcium hormone Calcitonin Remove bone spurs Biologics Interferon Immune stimulation For example, cellulite is a condition involving the circulation as well as lymph flow of the adipose tissue; thus a vasodilator (increases blood flow), a stimulator of lymph drainage, and a lipolytic agent (breaks down fat tissue) are used. Another example of using multiple agents is for hair growth. Male and female balding is related to many factors, including excessive androgens (sex hormones), poor scalp blood flow, and nutrient deficiencies. The mesotherapy protocol for hair growth, therefore, involves use of a combination of nutrients (such as biotin, hyaluronic acid, and silica, for example), vasodilators, and androgen blockers.

Dr. Jacque Le Coz, former president of the French Society of Mesotherapy and Mesotherapist for the French National Sports Teams, has written three books on Mesotherapy, including Mesotherapie et medecine esthetique (Solal Publishing, France), Mesotherapie et traumatologie sportive (Masson Publishing, France), and Mesotherapie en medecine generale. Dr. Le Coz was privileged to become the pupil of the founder of mesotherapy, Dr. M Pistorand, and even became like a son to him. Dr. Pistor wrote the prefaces to each of Dr. Le Coz’s books. Dr. Hauser received training in mesotherapy from Dr. Le Coz at his Paris clinic. As outlined in Dr. Le Coz’s books, Mesotherapy has been shown to be effective for the following conditions: Sports injuries: · Arthropathy · Barre-Lieou Syndrome · Chronic Joint Swelling · Ligament Sprain · Meniscal Tear · Muscle Tear · Muscular Bruises · Overuse Injuries · Periosteitis · Plantar Fasciitis · Shin Splints · Stress Fractures · Tendon Calcifications · Tendon Degeneration · Tendon Strain Skin conditions: · Acne · Alopecia · Cellulite · Contusions · Eczema · Hair Loss · Herpes Infection · Hypertrophic Scars · Lipodystrophy · Male/Female Hair Loss · Obesity Stretch Lines · Psoriasis · Rides · Scar Disorders · Sun Damaged Skin · Telangiectasias · Venous Insufficiency · Vitiligo · Wrinkles Chronic painful conditions: · Bone Spurs · Bursitis · Calcific Tendonitis · Carpal Tunnel Syndrome · Causalgia · CervicoBrachalgia · Chondromalacia · Chronic Low Back Pain · Contractures · De Quervain Tenosynovitis · Degenerative Arthritis · Degenerative Disc Disease · Dupytren’s Contracture · Fibromyalgia · Frozen Shoulder · Gout · Herniated Disc Pain · Herpes Zoster Pain · Ligament Sprain · Migraine Headaches · Muscle Spasms · Myofascial Pain · Neuralgia · Osteochondrosis · Post-Fracture Pain · Post-Surgical Pain · Post-Whiplash Pain · Pseudogout · Radiculopathy · Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy · Rheumatoid Arthritis · Spondylolisthesis · Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome · Tension Headache · TMJ Syndrome · Trigeminal Neuralgia · Trigger Finger · Ulnar Neuropathy General medical conditions: · Allergies · Alopecia · Asthma · Autoimmune Disases · Bronchitis · Childhood Infections · Chronic Fatigue · Chronic Infections · Chronic Sinusitis · Chronic UTIs · Cigarette Addiction · Compulsive Behavior · Constipation · Coronary Insufficiency · Degenerative Arthritis · Depression · Dysmenorrhea · Gastritis · Generalized Anxiety · Genital Herpes · Glaucoma · Glossodynia · Hearing Loss · Hemorrhoids · Hepatitis · Insomnia · Irritable Bowel Syndrome · Lymphedema · Menstrual Irregularity · Migraine Headache · Obesity · Presbyopia · Prostatitis · Restless Legs · Rheumatoid Arthritis · Slow Metabolism · Slow Metabolism · Spasmatic Colitis · Vaginal/Anal Itching · Vascular Insufficiency · Vertigo Mesotherapy for Calcifications and Bone Spurs Traditional medicine currently offers only one method to remove bone spurs: surgery. Bone spurs generally form as the body’s response to stabilize a weak structure. Prolotherapy is therefore, successful because it strengthens weakened connective tissues, and relieves the pain of bone spurs.

Mesotherapy and Endotherapy (deeper injections with the same solutions) offer non-surgical alternatives to decreasing and eliminating the actual bone spurs, not just the pain of the bone spurs. By using compounds that affect calcium metabolism, such as EDTA, a calcium chelator, and Calcitonin, a calcium hormone, these treatments can successfully remove bone spurs over a period of time. Athletes commonly experience calcifications in structures such as the biceps and rotator cuff tendons. Mesotherapy and Endotherapy are useful treatments to employ when these structures are painful. These treatments will, over time, help the body rid itself of the abnormal physiology that led to the calcifications, thus, reducing their size and negative effects. Top Mesotherapy for Medical Esthetics Many Mesotherapists practice the specialty of Medical Esthetics because of the beautifying effects Mesotherapy has on the skin. The skin is often treated successfully with Mesotherapy. Wrinkles and cellulite respond well to Mesotherapy. The injections reach not only the different layers of the skin, but the subcutaneous fat as well, helping reverse the physiology that makes cellulite form. Top Cellulite Cellulite is a condition in which abnormal “nodules” of fat form in the midsection and thighs, more commonly in women than men. This gives the appearance of a ruffling of the skin. The condition is caused by abnormal physiology in the skin and subcutaneous fat. It involves a type of insufficiency in the venolymphatic system.

Mesotherapy injections are given to not only improve the venous and lymphatic flow, but to also break down the fat nodules. The solutions generally consist of a vasodilator, lymph flow stimulator, and an anesthetic. Because cellulite involves an abnormality in fat accumulation, Mesotherapy injections should be done in conjunction with a comprehensive natural medicine program designed to improve overall metabolism. This would have the effect of increasing weight loss and improving overall health. Hormone imbalances are often at the core of the problem and need to be corrected to have maximum benefits. If the underlying physiology is corrected and maintained, then Mesotherapy is done in an initial series. If it recurs, then the process will need to be repeated. Top Wrinkles Wrinkles, like other conditions involving the skin, have a multifactorial etiology. Excessive skin wrinkles or rides, can be caused by overall dehydration, excessive sun exposure, genetics, facial expressions, muscle atrophy, fatty acid deficiencies, hormone imbalances, nutrient deficiencies, and many other causes. As with cellulite treatment, it is best to utilize Mesotherapy for wrinkles in the context of a comprehensive natural medicine program to correct some of the above causes. For the person with stress and increased muscle contraction in the forehead, Botox injections can be given. Excessive wrinkles can also be a sign of advanced or aggressive aging, which emphasizes the need even more to utilize Mesotherapy, along side of a comprehensive Mid-Life Medicine regime. This may involve the use of regenerative therapies, natural hormone replacement, nutriceuticals, appropriate metabolic-type diet, and other Mid-Life Medicine measures. As with cellulite, Mesotherapy for wrinkles may often need to be repeated after the initial series. Top The Technique of Mesotherapy For those who have been fortunate enough to have Prolotherapy or Neural Therapy injections, you will be happy to know that the injections of Mesotherapy hurt magnitudes less than Prolotherapy or Neural Therapy. Mesotherapy injections involve extremely small needles that penetrate the body only a very small depth, which is typically four to six millimeters. Many of the needle sticks are not even felt because often times the skin is pinched by the clinician prior to and during the injections.

Mesotherapy treatments are typically given once per week. As improvement is seen, the treatments may be given less frequently, such as once every two weeks or once per month. If quicker improvement is necessary, such as an athlete desiring to resume athletic activities, treatments may be given twice per week. Mesotherapy can involve anywhere between eight and 300 shots, depending on the condition and amount of area covered. When more than 20 shots are given, it is typically because the person is getting multipricking or Mesolift done. Both of these Mesotherapy techniques involve very superficial, quick injections, taking less than a couple of minutes to do all of the injections, thereby maximizing the amount of area stimulated. This is often necessary for conditions such as cellulite, wrinkles, and hair loss, where a maximum area must be stimulated to produce a good result. The number of Mesotherapy treatments needed depends upon many variables, including the condition, the abnormal physiology causing the condition, as well as the chronicity of the problem. A minimum of three to five sessions of Mesotherapy are generally done to access response.

For long term chronic conditions such as cellulite and wrinkles, at least 15 sessions of Mesotherapy will be needed. For more acute conditions, such as sports injuries, only one to three sessions may be needed. (See Figure 3.) Top Figure 3: Nutritional Products to assist connective tissue healing. Item Ingredients Use Pro-Cartilage Ascorbic acid, Glucosamine, Chondroitin Sulfate, and Bromelain Aids soft tissue healing Pro-Collagen Vitamin A, Vitamin D3, Folic Acid, B-12, Biotin, PABA MSM, Nettles, Horsetail, Saw Palmetto, Fo Ti Root Support for hair loss; thinning, balding, dull or graying hair; and brittle nails ProloMax Potassium, Magnesium, Fo Ti Root, MSM, L-Proline, Siberian Ginseng, L-Cysteine, Horsetail, RNA, Gotu Kola, Activan, and Glucosamine. Support connective tissue growth,heal sports injuries, musculoskeletal pain, & after Prolotherapy. Skin & Nails Multi vitamin/mineral, L-Proline Silica, Burdock Root, Nettles, Gotu Kola, Dandelion Root, Milk Thistle, Grape Seed Connective tissue healing and promoting healthy skin and stronger nails Vita Vessel Horse Chestnut Butcher’s Broom, Gota Kola, and Troxerutin Treat varicose veins blood clots, hemorrhoids, and overall blood circulation. GlucoBurn Citrimax Increase metabolismburn fat, and lose weight. Power Activator Pantothene, Iodine, Zinc, American Ginseng, Creatine, Lutien, Lipoic Acid, Prickly Ash, Cayenne Pepper, Siberian Ginseng, Tribulus Terrestris, Riboflavin Iincrease metabolism build strength, and lose weight Sports Doc Meal Replacement 14 grams soy protein plus vitamins and minerals. Meal replace-ment, protein supplement.

Web site of Monte J. Meldman MD

What is mesotherapy?

Mesotherapy is a revolutionary alternative to liposuction, endermologie, plastic surgery and other invasive cosmetic procedures claiming to reduce fat and cellulite. Mesotherapy is a non-surgical, non-invasive injection therapy used successfully in treatments for cellulite reduction, weight loss, face and neck rejuvenation and body sculpting. Mesotherapy has excellent results when used in addition to, or in replacement of Botox and/or Restylane treatments for facial wrinkle reduction.

Mesotherapy is a cutting edge anti-aging injection technique that is performed by licensed health care clinicians. The mesotherapy treatment involves a microinjection of a customized mixture including vitamins, amino acids, and medications placed just millimeters under the skin into the problematic area. Just a “drop” of mesotherapy solution is used at each injection site.

Mesotherapy is a premier treatment offered by BioAge International. It is virtually painless, requires no post-operative recovery time, requires no bandages or girdles and no anesthesia is necessary. Bio Age Clinics have developed their own mesotherapy injection formula called Microinjection Therapy (MIT).

InnovativeMedical

Mesotherapy Not Proven As A Safe Alternative to Liposuction

Plastic Surgeons Caution Against Unknown Dangers

For Immediate Release: April 18, 2005

ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, Ill.

The allure of shedding unwanted pockets of fat with a series of simple injections, known as mesotherapy, sounds too good to be true – and it just might be. According to an ASPS Device & Technique Assessment (DATA) Committee report published in the April 15 issue of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® (PRS), the official medical journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), patients should be wary of mesotherapy until the safety

and effectiveness of the procedure are confirmed.

“The promise of a non-surgical, permanent method for fat removal and body contouring is obviously very appealing, but mesotherapy is not proven to be the miracle cure to a thinner you,” said Alan Matarasso, MD, study co-author. “The problem with mesotherapy is the whole technique is shrouded in mystery. Liposuction remains the only proven method to safely and permanently remove fat.”

Touted as a non-surgical alternative to liposuction, mesotherapy involves injecting medications and plant extracts into layers of fat and connective tissue under the skin. The injected ingredients may include agents that are used to open blood vessels, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, enzymes, nutrients, antibiotics and hormones. Mesotherapy may be used in conjunction with dietary modification, hormone replacement therapy, exercise and nutritional supplements. No drug is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in mesotherapy.

Although the practice of mesotherapy has been around for decades in Europe, it has only recently been introduced in the United States. There are no published scientific studies demonstrating if the effects are permanent, why or if certain ingredients work, or how safe mesotherapy is for patients. In addition, there is no standardization in mesotherapy. The types of drugs used vary from physician to physician as does the quantity and frequency of injections.

Mesotherapy

Mesotherapy may cost $1,000 to $1,500 per treatment with three to six treatments required. This can prove costly for patients who may not receive the desired results.

“Plastic surgeons are constantly researching better methods to help patients achieve their desired look; however, patients’ health and safety is always foremost on our minds,” said Dr. Matarasso. “There is no information on what happens to fatty acids once they leave the targeted area or how the various ingredients affect the body’s organs and other tissues. There is simply too much we do

not know about mesotherapy to say it is unquestionably safe for patients.”


Currently, liposuction is the only method that has been proven to safely and effectively remove fat. According to ASPS statistics, liposuction was the most popular cosmetic surgical procedure in 2004, with more than 325,000 procedures performed.

“Without data to support claims that mesotherapy works, the procedure appears to be a mystic type of therapy,” said Susan Kaweski, MD, ASPS DATA Committee chair. “The DATA Committee has not seen any long-term studies that would prove mesotherapy actually removes fat from the body. We need to know a lot more about this procedure before plastic surgeons can endorse mesotherapy and recommend it to patients.

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons is the largest organization of board-certified plastic surgeons in the world. With more than 5,000 members, the society is recognized as a leading authority and information source on cosmetic and reconstructive plastic surgery. ASPS comprises 94 percent of all board-certified plastic surgeons in the United States. Founded in 1931, the society represents physicians certified by The American Board of Plastic Surgery or The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

For further Study


Mesotherapy

Complications from Repeated Injection or Puncture of Old Polyacrylamide Gel Implant Sites: Case Reports

An evaluation of mesotherapy solutions for inducing lipolysis and treating cellulite

Nontuberculous mycobacteria infection after mesotherapy: preliminary report of 15 cases.

Soft-tissue infections due to non-tuberculous mycobacteria following mesotherapy. What is the price of beauty

Histological changes associated with mesotherapy for fat dissolution

Mesotherapy and Phosphatidylcholine Injections: Historical Clarification and Review

Posted by Pat in 12:56:20 | Permalink | No Comments »